wut yall think about the 2005 mustang (the looks of it)? sry i couldnt provide a link, im on a cell fone, just look it up on google or sumthin

Why did you post this here? We do have a American Car section you know. :roll:
And I think the 2005 Mustang is UGLY, the concept was sweet....the production
car Ford messed up as usual.

LOL, yeah I liked the Concept aswell, but now the production car is all ****** up

LOL, yeah I liked the Concept aswell, but now the production car is all ****** up

Thats Ford for you.

The new Mustang looks like crap, period. The front isn't that bad, not at all, but the rear... It is sooo out of shape! It's too fat and blurry.

At least the concept car was nice lol.

I think its freakin ugly

ya i maybe itl start a new style or something

ya i maybe itl start a new style or somethingYeah ugliness....lol.

indeed

What? all is matter of opinion, many people liked the catfish like front end on the camaro so what?

I think it looks cool, the concept was better but it's still good in my book

its aight

ne1 got comparison pics of the concept and 2005 :?: :?: :!:

i saw leaked photos awhile ago and the 2005 model was nicer the headlights were similar but were cover with black glass

I really like the new Mustangs. I couldn't believe they are going to be mass produced, they look so nice! It's gonna wear off when I start seeing 20,000 a day though :(

ya i maybe itl start a new style or somethingYeah ugliness....lol.

LOL

It could have been good but they went with ugly, I hate that retro crap ford does.

It may not be as exciting as the concept but it's pretty damn cool, i want one,

Base V6:
http://www.2005mustang.us/05/23.jpg
http://www.2005mustang.us/05/5.jpg
http://www.2005mustang.us/05/72.jpg

GT:
http://www.2005mustang.us/05/1.jpg
http://www.2005mustang.us/05/2.jpg
http://www.2005mustang.us/05/40.jpg
http://www.2005mustang.us/05/59.jpg
http://www.2005mustang.us/05/9.jpg
http://www.2005mustang.us/05/31.jpg
http://www.2005mustang.us/05/27.jpg

And no, red is not the only leather color available, also remember these are the first ones, look out maybe for a bullit, a mach 1, a boss302, maybe even a boss 351, some shelby badges, like a shelby gt350 or shelby gt500 and the Cobra

Also the 202hp SOHC v6 is gonna be replaced at 05 by a 3.5 DOHC Duratec engine with 260hp and a similar torque figure.

I think they are gonna offer irs on the whole lineup after sometime, they have a 5 spd auto, and i heard they maybe making a non cobra 6 spd manual for lesser models, they are gonna keep the tremec for the more powerful cobra variant

and a freebie the Shelby Cobra concept

http://mustangs.bradbarnett.net/shows/detroit04/shelby/44-WP.jpg
http://mustangs.bradbarnett.net/shows/detroit04/shelby/29-WP.jpg

It's gearing could allow a theorical top speed of 416km/h but i dont think aerodinamics are good enough for that, 6.4 Liter DOHC V10 making 600+hp and 500+lbft of torque. As a concept it already got 3.9 0-60 times and 160km/h at the track (electronically limited because of development prototype)

Other cool features is 3 cameras instead of side mirrors, and a digital screen in place of the center one, providing a perfect 180º view of what is behind, also better leg room than crown victoria since the tranny is located at the rear, with a torque tube instead a conventional driveshaft

from these pics they look pretty decent, i like the cobra model, but still i am not a huge fan of american cars so...

Pas mal, pas mal...

and that mean?

Not bad, not bad... (french)

As an Italian one would guess that you would understand some french. :P

thats what i thought, cuz it looks like it but i had just woke up and i was kinda tired and stuff so i didnt really look at the words... :lol:

I like the new Mustang and I cant wait to get one they look real clean and they have the power to back it up!

whats with this stang hating? Ugly, blurry, fat, F**ked up, S**ty? The only problem i have with the stang is the GT and it's huge fog lights. Totally un apealing. But other than that, it's great. Like the GT, but more realistic. It's a great improvement over the fox chassis stangs.

Yeah, it's really hard for me to understand anyone NOT liking this car......Must be something deeper with no real reasoning... :|

Wow that Mustang is pretty sweet, except for the headlights :(

Why is every one hating on the new headlights they look to me like the same shape that the 60's mustangs headlights were so that in my book is really cool.

Actually its starting to look better to me some. One of the car mags I think Road and Track had a big article on the new mustang and they had some drawing of what a GT500 could look like if done, omg that car was sweet looking.
Can somebody post that pic?

You ok Ravneel :?:

Still not banned Ravneel? :lol:

EEEWWWWW!!!!!!!! :lol:

tre mal! c'est tre mal!

the front was a good idea, but they just ruined it, the back is just UGLY

Well, what Ford intended was to bring back Mustang enthusiasts by fusing some parts of the vintage 1960s Mustang and the new '90s-'00 Mustangs, I think it turned out well, but I feel like it'll be unpopular once all the teenagers go buy 1, but hopefully the high sticker price will prevent that :twisted:

tre mal! c'est tre mal!
tres

tre mal! c'est tre mal!
tres

:oops: at least that didn't happen in class during a test.. :lol:

:lol:

Think i might get used to some American cars i like these 8)

i like it, i'm not really a mustang fan but they did a good job of modernizing a classic, the same can't be said for the new GTO

i like it, i'm not really a mustang fan but they did a good job of modernizing a classic, the same can't be said for the new GTO


I think the opposite, I like the new GTO........HATE the new Mustang.

i like it, i'm not really a mustang fan but they did a good job of modernizing a classic, the same can't be said for the new GTOI think the opposite, I like the new GTO........HATE the new Mustang.I agree, but it's a new look 8)

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept5.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept29.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept2.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept20.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept5.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept29.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept2.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept20.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept5.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept29.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept2.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept20.html

I think you mean:
http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept5.jpg
http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept29.jpg
http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept2.jpg
http://www.fast-autos.net/ford/gtrconcept20.jpg

haha yes, indied.. what did i do wrong? :?

haha yes, indied.. what did i do wrong? :?

You put the webpage they are on, not the jpeg file name. All I had to do here was change .html to .jpg, but I usually paste the picture's address from the picture properties
(right click, properties, url ... etc etc). " image properties "
It gets easier the more you do it!!

i know, thank you...
i made alot of topics/postes..
i dont know why it didnt work

They are very good pics, the best variety i've seen so far, but I have seen better quality ones though 8)